Katie Marwick interrogates the legal applications of neuroimaging
In 2009, evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was submitted to a US court for the first time. The defence for Brian Dugan, a convicted murderer and rapist, suggested that brain scans demonstrating blood flow abnormalities more common in psychopathy should be viewed as a mitigating circumstance when choosing a sentence for his crime. Despite this defence, he was sentenced to death.
Dugan's case was the first use of fMRI in court. However, a range of neuroimaging technologies have had applications in criminal law. They have been used to demonstrate injury, to suggest diminished responsibility for crimes on the basis of brain abnormalities and, most recently, touted as potential truth detectors. This article first describes some notable cases involving neuroimaging, and then considers some possible technical and ethical concerns about the new 'mind reading' machines. Read more »
Recent comments
34 weeks 2 days ago
38 weeks 3 min ago
1 year 2 weeks ago
1 year 8 weeks ago
1 year 15 weeks ago
1 year 22 weeks ago
1 year 31 weeks ago
1 year 41 weeks ago
1 year 51 weeks ago
2 years 23 hours ago